Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Pteronotus. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Pteronotus davyi 41219
From Pavan 2017:
"The contact zone between P. fulvus and P. davyi is located in Nicaragua and Costa Rica, but our data could not exactly place the geographic limits for these lineages in Central America, since molecular sampling was not available for this region."
Nicaragua and Costa Rica are left out of the maps and atlases for both output taxa, so observations there will be moved to genus.
I had another thought, which is that I could give the Nicaragua and Costa Rica range to davyi, following the morphological (rather than genetic) analysis: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/4132897#page/106 Would that be preferable?
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
I had another thought, which is that I could give the Nicaragua and Costa Rica range to davyi, following the morphological (rather than genetic) analysis: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/4132897#page/106
Would that be preferable?
@jakob @juancruzado